Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leslie Firestone's avatar

Agreed that this is the moment. We are hurtling towards martial law. I just read that Texas governor is sending out 5000 National Guard troops on Saturday! The one thing I would say is that using the word “peaceful” has been discussed as inappropriate in this context and can be racist. The violence comes from the State not the people. People are responding as is necessary. A word that may be more appropriate and that I have heard used is “disciplined”.

For context:

some ways the term "peaceful" might be used in a way that is perceived as racist:

Dismissal of legitimate grievances: Demanding or focusing excessively on "peacefulness" during protests against racial injustice can sometimes be seen as a way to control or discredit the movement, implying that the protests are not valid unless they remain entirely free of disruption, even if some of the disruption is a direct result of the injustice being protested. Some argue that emphasizing "peaceful" protests can inadvertently minimize the anger and frustration felt by those experiencing systemic racism.

Contrasting peaceful protests with imagined violence: Highlighting peaceful aspects of a protest while simultaneously implying that "looters" or "roving bands" (often coded language with racist connotations) are a threat can be seen as a way to create a false narrative and reinforce negative stereotypes.

Policing protests: The emphasis on "peacefulness" can sometimes feel like an order to remain passive and compliant, particularly for marginalized groups who are already subject to excessive policing.

Dismissing acts of resistance: Sometimes, the term "peaceful" is used in a way that implies that only quiet, non-disruptive forms of protest are acceptable, thus delegitimizing more assertive or even confrontational forms of protest that may be necessary to challenge ingrained injustices.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts